"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."
Cureus is on a mission to change the long-standing paradigm of medical publishing, where submitting research can be costly, complex and time-consuming.
The SIQ for this article will be revealed
open excision, arthroscopy, sports medicine, bipartite patella, knee
Cite this article as: Pan T, Hennrikus W (July 09, 2022) Symptomatic Bipartite Patella in Adults Treated With Open Excision: Outcomes and Management. Cureus 14(7): e26705. doi:10.7759/cureus.26705
Bipartite patella affects about 2% of people. Most cases are asymptomatic; however, some develop anterior knee pain during a sporting activity or trauma. When conservative treatment fails, surgery can be considered. This study aims to report the outcomes of fragment excision with or without lateral release in adults with the symptomatic bipartite patella.
The study was approved by the College of Medicine IRB. A retrospective review was performed. Patients were excluded if aged < 18 or had prior knee surgery. Data collected included: age, gender, BMI, sports played, occupation, physical exam findings, Saupe classification, conservative and surgical treatment, advanced imaging used, duration of follow-up, Lysholm score and postoperative complications.
Eight patients were studied. The average age was 28.4 years and BMI was 31.5. Sporting activities included hunting, swimming, soccer, golfing and softball. Occupations included office job, laborer, manufacturing plant worker and truck driver. All patients complained of anterior knee pain exacerbated by sports or work. All patients failed >6 months of conservative treatment. Saupe classification included seven types III (superolateral) and one type II (lateral). Surgical treatment included one open excision, six arthroscopic-assisted open excisions and one arthroscopic-assisted open excision with the lateral release. The duration of follow-up averaged 15 months. The average preoperative and postoperative Lysholm score was 75 and 93, respectively. One postoperative complication occurred.
Bipartite patella is an uncommon cause of anterior knee pain in adults. When pain persists despite conservative care, fragment excision of less than 12% of the whole patella with or without lateral release resulted in excellent outcomes in the majority of cases.
Bipartite patella (BP) is an anatomical variation found in 2% of the general population [1]. BP occurs when the secondary ossification centers of the patella fail to fuse during adolescence [2]. Starting at the age of three, the multiple ossification centers of the patella start to fuse from the center toward the periphery into the largest sesamoid bone of the human body [3]. However, failure of complete union results in the development of BP often connected by synchondrosis, a layer of fibrocartilage [4].
BP was first documented in 1883 by Wenzel Gruber in St. Petersburg, Russia, during the autopsy of a 21-year-old farmer who had a small piece of bone attached superolateral to the patella [3]. In 1921, Saupe classified BPa into three types in relation to the location of the accessory fragment with type I at the inferior pole (5%), type II at the lateral pole (20%) and, most commonly, type III at the superolateral pole (75%) [4].
In the majority of patients, BP is asymptomatic and often an incidental finding on radiographs; however, rarely, it can cause anterior patellofemoral knee pain and localized tenderness. Symptoms often start at adolescence during sporting activities. The majority of symptomatic BP can be successfully managed with conservative treatment including rest, stretching, brief immobilization, bracing, moderation of sporting activity, NSAIDs and physical therapy [5].
Current surgical modalities include open or arthroscopic excision, lateral retinacular release and open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) [2]. The purpose of this study is to report the outcomes of open fragment excision with or without lateral release in adults with the symptomatic BP.
The study was approved by the College of Medicine Institutional Review Board (IRB#:00012885). A retrospective chart and radiograph review were performed on patients who underwent surgery for symptomatic BP refractory to conservative treatment from 2009 to 2019. Patients who were excluded included: < 18 years of age or prior history of knee surgery. Data extracted included age, sex, laterality, body mass index (BMI), sporting activity, occupation, physical exam findings, conservative treatment, Saupe classification (Figure 1) [4], radiographic size of the fragment as a percentage of the entire patella, mechanism of injury (MOI), use of advanced imaging, surgical approach, duration of follow up, and complications. Clinical outcomes were measured using the Lysholm Scale [4]. The duration until return to full sporting activity and follow-up was recorded.
Eight patients and eight knees were studied (six males, two females). The average age was 28.4 years (range, 21 to 63 years) and BMI was 31.5 (range, 22 to 45). All patients complained of anterior knee pain exacerbated by sporting or work-related activities, especially with kneeling, twisting, squatting, jumping, or lifting heavy items. Sporting activities included hunting (two), swimming (one), soccer (one), golfing (one) and softball (one). The levels of sporting activity included seven recreational and one collegiate level. Occupations included manufacturing plant worker (two), truck driver (two), office job (one) and heavy-duty laborer (one). MOI included repetitive traction forces (three) and trauma (five), which were asymptomatic prior to the injury. On the physical exam, six had tenderness to palpation directly over the site of the bony division, five had mild effusion and one had crepitus at the patellofemoral joint. All knees demonstrated a full range of motion. All patients had failed >6 months of conservative treatment including PT, activity modification, stretching, bracing, steroid injections, Kinieseo taping, icing and NSAIDs (Table 1). Saupe classification included seven type III (superolateral) and one type II (lateral). One knee had lateral displacement and seven had normal positioning of the patella on patellofemoral tracking. The radiographic size of the fragment as a percentage of the overall size of the patella averaged 8.4% (range, 6% to 11%). This was obtained by dividing the surface area of the accessory fragment by the surface area of the patella on an AP radiographic view. Seven patients had advanced imaging with MRI or CT to rule out other intra-articular disorders (Figure 2). No additional intra-articular injuries were noted.
Surgical treatment included one open excision, six arthroscopic-assisted open excision and one arthroscopic-assisted open excision with lateral retinacular release (Table 2). Diagnostic arthroscopy was performed in seven knees to access the BP area, medial and lateral gutters and menisci, popliteus tendon attachment on the femur, fascicle attachments to the lateral meniscus, and medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL). Chondral damage in these knees was graded using the International Cartilage Repair Society Grading System. Three knees had Grade I, three had Grade III and one had Grade IV chondral damage. There were no concomitant meniscal injuries. Postoperative management included: partial weightbearing as tolerated with crutches, knee bracing, icing, NSAIDs, physical therapy, a home exercise program and a gradual return to sporting activities or occupation at one month.
The duration of follow-up averaged 15 months (range, 6-36 months). Compared to the average preoperative Lysholm score of 75 (range, 58-84), the average Lysholm Score at final follow-up was 93 (range, 90-98). Postoperatively, six patients returned to pre-surgery sporting or occupational activity at an average of 4.7 weeks (range, 4-7 weeks). Two patients received worker’s compensation. The most common postoperative finding was soft tissue swelling in five patients and 1 cm quadriceps muscle atrophy in four patients during the first-month follow-up visit. Thigh circumference was measured using a measuring tape and compared with that of the contralateral side. Two patients had chronic knee pain three years after surgery, one of whom applied for worker’s compensation.
One complication occurred during the follow-up period in a patient treated by open excision. A 38-year-old manufacturing plant worker developed a postoperative wound infection and was treated with antibiotics; she applied for worker’s compensation and did not return to work. None of the workers compensation patients had a secondary procedure within five years.
BP is a rare cause of anterior knee pain due to the failure of the secondary ossification centers of the patella to completely fuse during adolescence. BP occurs in 2% of the population with equal prevalence in males compared to females. BP is often an incidental, asymptomatic finding on radiographs [2]. The etiology of the pain includes the repetitive traction forces of the extensor mechanism of the knee or the patellar maltracking caused by the “tight” lateral retinaculum pulling at the accessory fragment [3]. A direct blow to the knee synchondrosis, or vascular insufficiency, can also contribute to the pain [3,5]. BP is best visualized on plain radiographs in the anterior-posterior and “skyline” views (Figure 3) [5]. MRI can provide a valuable assessment of the morphological and pathological changes of BP, especially in determining the fragment height and distance between the fragment and patella [6,7].
The majority of symptomatic BP can be successfully treated conservatively with activity modification, NSAIDs, icing, physical therapy, bracing or ultrasound-guided injections [8]. When conservative treatment fails, surgery can then be considered [9]. Few studies have reported on the outcomes of operative treatment in the adult population [5,10,11].
Open excision with resection of the accessory fragment is the most commonly performed procedure in adults [12,13]. Lateral release may reduce excess lateral traction force, denervate the pain fibers to the fragment, improve the patellofemoral tracking and promote bony union [13-16]. In the current study, open fragment excision with or without lateral release on eight knees yielded four (50%) good and four (50%) excellent results. The decision to perform the lateral release was made on a case-by-case basis by the individual surgeon. An overdone lateral release can result in medial patella instability. No case of medial instability occurred in the current paper.
When opting for excision with resection of the accessory fragment, it is important to consider the percentage of the patella that can be safely resected to minimize patellar instability, joint incongruity and arthritis [17]. No more than 40% of the patella should be removed [18]. Excessive excision can decrease the mechanical advantage that the patella provides to the extensor mechanism [19]. In the study with excision, an average of 7.4% (range, 6% to 11%) of the patella was resected.
Other operative modalities of symptomatic BP include arthroscopic excision, tension band wiring or ORIF [7,20]. In arthroscopic excision, the anteromedial and anterolateral portals provide excellent access to the BP fragment with the knee in full extension [21,22]. Compared to open excision, arthroscopic excision provides faster recovery, fewer complications, less pain, and expedited return of muscle strength, knee effusion resolution, and return to work or sport [3,23]. Further, arthroscopy offers advantages both for diagnostic recognition and intraoperative treatment. The long-term outcomes of the two techniques, however, are similar.
Tauber et al. reported an 18-year-old who suffered a traumatic separation from the synchondrosis while playing soccer. He was treated with tension band wiring of the atypical, large, and horizontal BP resulting in a successful bony union of the BP [24]. Vaishya et al. reported ORIF of the BP using a compression screw in two patients with fragments measuring 2.66 and 2.61 cm2, respectively. Excision of the large fragments in these cases may have led to the incongruity of the patellofemoral joint and increased risk of arthritis [25]. ORIF with extensor mechanism repair provides successful outcomes in reported cases of traumatic separation of BP with concomitant quadriceps tendon rupture [20]. In 2015, Matic et al. evaluated the return to activity in athletes with symptomatic BP treated by excision, lateral release, or ORIF. Fragment excision was associated with the best results, with a 91% rate of symptom relief and return to full sporting activity [25].
Limitations of this study include: 1) the small number of cases investigated due to the rarity of this pathological finding; 2) the lack of a control group and 3) the limited period of follow-up. Given the low prevalence of this condition in the normal population that is operated on, a randomized control was not possible.
The current study reaffirms the existing literature. Open excision with or without lateral release followed by early patella, quadriceps, and patellar tendon mobilization serves as a viable surgical modality in treating adults with symptomatic BP. Excision of the accessory fragment, averaging approximately 7% of the overall patella, relieves pain and preserves the patellar integrity. Lateral release reduced the painful tracking forces applied to the synchondrosis. Postoperative outcome scores were good to excellent using the Lysholm scale at an average of 15 months’ follow-up. Complete return to sporting activity or work is patient-dependent and individualized according to the patient's discretion.
Symptomatic BP is an uncommon cause of anterior knee pain in adults. Open excision with or without lateral release followed by early patella, quadriceps, and patellar tendon mobilization serves as a viable surgical modality in treating adults with symptomatic BP. When pain persists despite conservative care, excision of the accessory fragment of less than 12% of the overall patella relieves pain and preserves the patellar integrity. Lateral release reduced the painful tracking forces applied to the synchondrosis. Postoperative outcome scores were good to excellent with excellent pain relief and return to full sporting or occupational activity in the majority of cases.
Orthopedic Surgery, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, USA
Orthopedics, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, USA
Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. College of Medicine Institutional Review Board issued approval 00012885. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Pan T, Hennrikus W (July 09, 2022) Symptomatic Bipartite Patella in Adults Treated With Open Excision: Outcomes and Management. Cureus 14(7): e26705. doi:10.7759/cureus.26705
Peer review began: September 17, 2021 Peer review concluded: July 07, 2022 Published: July 09, 2022
© Copyright 2022 Pan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Scholarly Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. Learn more here.
This link will take you to a third party website that is not affiliated with Cureus, Inc. Please note that Cureus is not responsible for any content or activities contained within our partner or affiliate websites.
Scholarly Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. SIQ™ assesses article importance and quality by embracing the collective intelligence of the Cureus community-at-large. All registered users are invited to contribute to the SIQ™ of any published article. (Authors cannot rate their own articles.)
High ratings should be reserved for work that is truly groundbreaking in its respective field. Anything above 5 should be considered above average. While all registered Cureus users can rate any published article, the opinion of domain experts is weighted appreciably more than that of non-specialists. An article’s SIQ™ will appear alongside the article after being rated twice and is recalculated with each additional rating.
Visit our SIQ™ page to find out more.
Scholarly Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. SIQ™ assesses article importance and quality by embracing the collective intelligence of the Cureus community-at-large. All registered users are invited to contribute to the SIQ™ of any published article. (Authors cannot rate their own articles.)
Already have an account? Sign in.
Please note that by doing so you agree to be added to our monthly email newsletter distribution list.
By joining Cureus, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.